<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font><blockquote type="cite">We also need to come up with a plan regarding cutting releases. When<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">3.2 is branched, will all "staged" back-ends be removed? Or will<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">they be left in the distribution so interested parties can build<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">them?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><br>I can't really think of any disadvantages to keeping staged backends<br>in releases. Being in a release would help a backend get more exposure<br>and increase the number of users/testers it would get.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree, there is no reason to remove it from the source drop of the release. The binaries produced for each release shouldn't include them though.</div><br></div><div>-Chris</div><br></body></html>