Christoph, Anton, I am appreciative of your quick feedback and  suggestion. I will consider it when preparing for the proposal.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">在 2012年3月23日 下午10:21，Anton Korobeynikov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anton@korobeynikov.info" target="_blank">anton@korobeynikov.info</a>></span>写道：<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>> Please look at the thread "Python bindings in tree" starting on 2012-03-16.<br>
> There are at least four Python binding projects currently running. (None of<br>
> them in GSoC)<br>
><br>
> I think it's a great idea to improve llvm-py, but I'd also suggest to first<br>
> look at the other bindig projects.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-March/thread.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-March/thread.html</a><br>
</div>Right. 1 complete bindings are much more preferable than 100 which<br>
are broken at some point.<br>
So, the "consolidation" of all of the bindings should be one side of<br>
this project. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

<div><br>
<br>
--<br>
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov<br>
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University<br>
</div><div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a>         <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>     Best Regards,<br>                                                                 Baozeng Ding<br>                                                                 OSTG,NFS,ISCAS<br>

<br><br>