<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:32 AMPDT, John Thompson wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">'ve run the tests from clang-tests/trunk/gcc-4_2-testsuite on a Ubuntu x86-64 Linux box with the following results:<br><br> === gcc Summary ===<br><br># of expected passes 29946<br># of unexpected failures 9938<br># of unexpected successes 29<br># of expected failures 28<br># of unresolved testcases 1451<br># of untested testcases 273<br># of unsupported tests 811<br>pid is 4456 -4456<br>output is clang version 2.9 (trunk 113841)<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></blockquote></div><div><br></div>For reference, here are the results from the last time I ran it with llvm-gcc, about a month ago:<div><br><div><div># of expected passes 39621</div><div># of unexpected failures 1112</div><div># of unexpected successes 2</div><div># of expected failures 59</div><div># of unresolved testcases 80</div><div># of untested testcases 280</div><div># of unsupported tests 1073</div></div><div><br></div></div><div>Many of the 9000 extra failures are probably llvm-gcc/clang differences that are nothing to do with you, though. The best way to get useful info out of this is to run it with and without the patch you're testing, and compare.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>