<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="Section1"><div style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; margin-top: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">2) The following test is commented out on purpose:<o:p></o:p></span></font></div><div style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; margin-top: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit<o:p></o:p></span></font></div><div style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; margin-top: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; "><o:p> </o:p></span></font></div><div style="margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; margin-top: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; ">Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition, it seems to work for us. Is there something wrong with this test (e.g. buggy test?). Or is (or was) llvm buggy when running this test?</span></font></div></div></div></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I looked at this at one point; it got very inconsistent failures in several different Darwin environments, both ppc and x86, both gcc and llvm-gcc. It looked like a memory error of some kind, wild load or store somewhere, use-after-free, something like that. It was not I who disabled it but my data led me to agree with that decision.</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>