<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Aaron Gray <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaronngray.lists@googlemail.com">aaronngray.lists@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c">On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Nick Lewycky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>Aaron Gray wrote:<br>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a><br></div>
<div>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>>> wrote:<br>><br>> Aaron Gray wrote:<br>> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>><br></div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>>>> wrote:<br>> ><br>
> > Aaron Gray wrote:<br>> > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Nick Lewycky<br>> <<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>>><br>> > > <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:nicholas@mxc.ca" target="_blank">nicholas@mxc.ca</a>>>>> wrote:<br>> > ><br>
> > > Aaron Gray wrote:<br>> > > > Hi,<br>> > > ><br>> > > > I partly built LLVM on Cygwin yesterday and it was<br>> fine as<br>
> > far as it<br>> > > > went. But after doing a svn update today I am<br>> getting the<br>> > following<br>> > > > warning on every compile :-<br>
> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > llvm[3]: Compiling LowerAllocations.cpp for<br>> Debug build<br>> > > ><br>
> /usr/src/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerAllocations.cpp:1:<br>> > > warning:<br>> > > > -fPIC ignored for target (all code is position<br>> > independent)<br>
> > > ><br>> > > ><br>> > > > This maybe happening on other targets too.<br>> > ><br>> > > Thanks for the report. This is certainly due to my change<br>
> > last night to<br>> > > make LLVM build as PIC by default.<br>> > ><br>> > > I was a little perplex at the warning as I could not<br>> ascertain where<br>
> > > thery were coming from and could see no obvious commit !:)<br>> > ><br>> > > Out of interest, could you point me to the patch or<br>> commit, please.<br>
> ><br>> > r65019 / r65020:<br>> ><br>> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090216/073983.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090216/073983.html</a><br>
> ><br>> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090216/073984.html" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090216/073984.html</a><br>
> ><br>> > Can you please email me if and when it is fixed :)<br>><br>> Should be fixed in r65229:<br>> <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65229" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65229</a><br>
> <<a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65229" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65229</a>><br>><br>> Cygwin is still giving "-fPIC ignored for target (all code is position<br>
> independent)" warnings :(<br><br></div></div>*Really!*<br><br>Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value<br>of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if<br>
that's erroneously false.<br>
<div> </div></blockquote></div></div>
<div>Hi Nick, </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am not famuliar enought with the build system to do this.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Can you give me a resision number to check out before your changes so I can get my code tested.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Then once I have done that I can tackel giving you some valid feedback.</div>
<div> </div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>You could send me a patch maybe that gives you the required information. I am quite up for doing whatevers required to get Cygwin functioning properly again.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Oh, I am going to try back to r65042.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Aaron</div>
<div> </div></div>