2009/1/1 Chris Lattner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clattner@apple.com" target="_blank">clattner@apple.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Talin wrote:<br>
> I'm thinking that getting unit tests for the classes in ADT should<br>
> be an early goal.<br>
<br>
</div>Can I suggest the AP[S]Int class? If you look in llvm/test/Integer<br>
you'll see a whole bunch of tests that really want to be unit tests<br>
but that aren't. :(</blockquote><div><br>Chris, do you mean *all* the .ll files in that dir should become unittests, or are you talking about some specific files that should be unittests, and others that should stay as llvm-as/llvm-dis tests?<br>
<br>I'm assuming a##.* are prime candidates, what about the others? Are the double llvm-as/llvm-dis tests about bitcode printing/parsing or are they really testing some auto-simplification built-in to the APSInt class?<br>
</div></div><br>