probably, you'll find the answer here: <a href="http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html">http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Basile STARYNKEVITCH
</b> <<a href="mailto:basile@starynkevitch.net">basile@starynkevitch.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Le Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:17:41PM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner écrivait/wrote:<br>><br>> Here is the schedule:<br>><br>> May 7th - Release branch created. Developers should begin reviewing<br>> all documentation.
<br>><br>> May 14th - Tar balls and binaries are released for general testing. I'll<br>> also need volunteers to create additional llvm-gcc binaries that I have<br>> not provided.<br>><br>> May 18th - All documentation changes should have been merged into the
<br>> release branch.<br>><br>> May 21st - Release!<br>><br><br><br>What about the migration to SubVersion? Is it related to release of LLVM2.0?<br><br>How will the svn migration happen? When should it be preferable or possible
<br>to use the svn command (instead of cvs) to get the latest LLVM source code?<br><br>Regards<br>--<br>Basile STARYNKEVITCH <a href="http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/">http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/</a><br>email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
<br>8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France<br>*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***<br>_______________________________________________<br>LLVM Developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">
LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br><a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>To become old and wise you need to be young and stupid first