[llvm-dev] Failures on clang-with-lto-ubuntu builders

[pawel k. via llvm-dev]

Cool. Thanks for letting me become less ignorant. Im still discovering llvm
and I pretty much love what I saw so far. Llvm+clang is a small wonder of
the world.

-Pawel

wt., 11.05.2021, 09:15 użytkownik David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
napisał:

> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:40 PM pawel k. <pawel.kunio at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>> That looks like great quick fix, Im wondering if we could propose data
>> format or computation model change for example to db- or other
>> disk-vs-mem-based where we could lto link huge projects anyway. I wonder
>> whether whole lto data needs to be loaded into mem at once and whether its
>> tree- or other datastructure based.
>>
>
> That's what ThinLTO is intended to/does address - but has tradeoffs. It
> has limited whole program data - but better than traditional compilation,
> since it can use profiling/other analysis to inform how to partition the
> program.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>>
>> -Pawel
>>
>> wt., 11.05.2021, 07:26 użytkownik Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> napisał:
>>
>>> On 5/10/21 10:09 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> > On 5/10/21 10:03 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>>> >> best to check the bot owners & include them on an email like this?
>>> But yeah, if they aren't responsive to stabilizing their bots - certainly
>>> open to disabling them straight on the zorg repo.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Is there a list of bot owners somewhere?  I tried to dig through the
>>> llvm-zorg
>>> > repo to figure out who owned the bot, but I couldn't find anything.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I've learned that there are instructions for finding bot owners in the
>>> Developer Policy:
>>> https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#working-with-the-ci-system
>>>
>>> It looks like Galina is the owner of these workers.
>>>
>>> -Tom
>>>
>>> > -Tom
>>> >
>>> >> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:59 PM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>     Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >>     Both the clang-with-lto-ubuntu and clang-with-lto-ubuntu-release
>>> builders are
>>> >>     consistently failing due to one of the linker jobs running out of
>>> memory.
>>> >>     Is there any easy way to fix these failures (Maybe by using zram?)
>>> >>     If not, can we disable these bots?
>>> >>
>>> >>     Thanks,
>>> >>     Tom
>>> >>
>>> >>     _______________________________________________
>>> >>     LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> >>     llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> >>     https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210511/2b626d84/attachment.html>