[llvm-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 23 07:49:36 PDT 2020


On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:05 PM Andrew Kelley <andrew at ziglang.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/20 9:51 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote:
> > Release Candidate 5 was just tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5 on the
> > release branch at 35627038123.
> >
> > Source code and docs are available at
> > https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc5 and
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5
> >
> > If nothing new comes up, I plan to tag 'final' on Monday. Testers, if
> > you still have cycles, please take this for a quick spin.
>
> I went ahead and updated all Zig's CI to use rc5, and ran into this problem:
>
> /usr/lib/llvm-10/lib/libclangCodeGen.a(BackendUtil.cpp.o): In function
> `(anonymous
> namespace)::EmitAssemblyHelper::EmitAssemblyWithNewPassManager(clang::BackendAction,
> std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream,
> std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream> >)':
> BackendUtil.cpp:(.text._ZN12_GLOBAL__N_118EmitAssemblyHelper30EmitAssemblyWithNewPassManagerEN5clang13BackendActionESt10unique_ptrIN4llvm17raw_pwrite_streamESt14default_deleteIS5_EE+0x16df):
> undefined reference to `getPollyPluginInfo()'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
>
> This is on Ubuntu Bionic, using apt.llvm.org. I believe this is
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44870 /
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/191
>
> This is a regression from LLVM 9. My suggestion to fix this is, rather
> than cutting rc6, to update apt.llvm.org with new binaries, which have
> polly disabled. It seems to me that people who want Polly enabled are
> compiling from source anyway.

That sounds reasonable to me. +Sylvestre Ledru  do you control these
package configs?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list