[llvm-dev] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here

Fri Sep 13 13:18:55 PDT 2019

It may be that the 'not' operator is not being found under bash at

: 'RUN: at line 12';   not

Perhaps this is would be better as the more commonly seen '!'.

Neil Nelson

On 9/13/19 12:12 PM, Neil Nelson via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> Toward the end of testing.9.0.0-rc4.log.
>
> Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.
> FAIL: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp (17057 of 64198)
> ******************** TEST 'Clang Tools :: 
> clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp' FAILED ********************
> Script:
> --
> : 'RUN: at line 1';   /usr/bin/python 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/../test/../clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py 
> --help
> : 'RUN: at line 2';   rm -rf 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tm
> p
> : 'RUN: at line 3';   mkdir 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp
> : 'RUN: at line 4';   echo 
> "[{\"directory\":\".\",\"command\":\"clang++ -c 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extr
> a/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/test.cpp\",\"file\":\"/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/tes
> t/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/test.cpp\"}]" | sed -e 
> 's/\\/\\\\/g' > 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/too
> ls/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/compile_commands.json
> : 'RUN: at line 5';   echo "Checks: '-*,modernize-use-auto'" > 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang
> -tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/.clang-tidy
> : 'RUN: at line 6';   echo "WarningsAsErrors: '*'" >> 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Out
> put/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/.clang-tidy
> : 'RUN: at line 7';   echo "CheckOptions:" >> 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-
> clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/.clang-tidy
> : 'RUN: at line 8';   echo "  - key: 
> modernize-use-auto.MinTypeNameLength" >> 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/c
> lang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/.clang-tidy
> : 'RUN: at line 9';   echo "    value:           '0'" >> 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/
> Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/.clang-tidy
> : 'RUN: at line 10';   cp 
> "/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp" 
> "/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/util
> s/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/test.cpp"
> : 'RUN: at line 11';   cd 
> "/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp"
> : 'RUN: at line 12';   not /usr/bin/python 
> /home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/../test/../clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py 
> "/home/nnelson/Do
> cuments/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc4/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-9.0.0-rc4.obj/tools/clang/tools/extra/test/clang-tidy/Output/run-clang-tidy.cpp.tmp/test.cpp"
> --
> Exit Code: 1
>
> Command Output (stdout):
> --
> usage: run-clang-tidy.py ...... [not included]
>
> ********************
> Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
>
> 15 warning(s) in tests.
> Testing Time: 4923.38s
> ********************
> Failing Tests (1):
>     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/run-clang-tidy.cpp
>
>   Expected Passes    : 62200
>   Expected Failures  : 256
>   Unsupported Tests  : 1741
>   Unexpected Failures: 1
> make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/check-all.dir/build.make:58: 
> CMakeFiles/check-all] Error 1
> make[3]: Target 'CMakeFiles/check-all.dir/build' not remade because of 
> errors.
> make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:354: CMakeFiles/check-all.dir/all] 
> Error 2
> make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:361: CMakeFiles/check-all.dir/rule] 
> Error 2
> make[1]: Target 'check-all' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:238: check-all] Error 2
> [Release+Asserts Phase3] check-all failed
>
> Neil Nelson
>
> On 9/13/19 2:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>> Thanks! I'll get this posted on the web site.
>>
>> The "Performing Test ... failed to compile" failures from cmake are
>> not interesting. But could you look in the log file and try to see
>> what were the tests that failed in the "check-all" step?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:39 PM Neil Nelson via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>  wrote:
>>> Xubuntu/Ubuntu 19.04, uploaded
>>>
>>> sha256sum clang+llvm-9.0.0-rc4-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.tar.xz
>>> 47a204e1f6d32b443001acb97e65b603de8eec9b493ca5b1f66c88a367d605dc
>>>
>>> grep fail in logs
>>> deferred_errors.log:[Release+Asserts Phase3] check-all failed
>>> testing.9.0.0-rc4.log:-- Performing Test HAVE_THREAD_SAFETY_ATTRIBUTES -- failed to compile
>>> testing.9.0.0-rc4.log:-- Performing Test HAVE_GNU_POSIX_REGEX -- failed to compile
>>> testing.9.0.0-rc4.log:[Release+Asserts Phase3] check-all failed
>>> testing.9.0.0-rc4.log:-- Performing Test HAVE_THREAD_SAFETY_ATTRIBUTES -- failed to compile
>>> testing.9.0.0-rc4.log:-- Performing Test HAVE_GNU_POSIX_REGEX -- failed to compile
>>>
>>> Neil Nelson
>>>
>>> On 9/10/19 4:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In
>>> the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4.
>>>
>>> Source code and docs are available at
>>> https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4  Binaries will be added as they
>>> become available.
>>>
>>> There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no
>>> open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last release
>>> candidate and that we can tag the final release soon.
>>>
>>> Please file bug reports for any issues you find, marking them blocking
>>> ofhttps://llvm.org/PR42474
>>>
>>> Release testers, please run the test script, share your results, and
>>> upload binaries.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hans
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190913/aad2d51e/attachment.html>