[llvm-dev] clang.exp/gn

[Nico Weber via llvm-dev]

Like every time: Vitaly, please remove that bot.

Nandor: The "exp" in "clang.exp" means "experimental", they don't have to
be kept green. We still shouldn't have a GN bot on the llvm waterfall, not
even on ".exp".

(FWIW, I had emailed Nandor before this email already – I monitor commits
to llvm/utils/gn and tell everyone who lands something there that it's not
required. It doesn't happen very often.)

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:52 AM Chris Bieneman <chris.bieneman at me.com>
wrote:

> The maintenance of the gn build is not a responsibility of LLVM
> contributors who don't use it. It should not block you form committing the
> patches you need, and the bot failing due to build system updates isn't
> your responsibility to fix. There are a group of contributors who maintain
> the build for their own workflows, and they will fix the failure when they
> get a chance.
>
> Since it is a holiday weekend in the US the contributors who maintain the
> gn build may not get around to fixing it until Tuesday.
>
> -Chris
>
> > On Aug 30, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering who owns the clang.exp bots which builds llvm using gn?
> > I need to add another generator to clang-tablegen, but the build seems
> > to be failing:
> >
> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/4816
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look at the problem.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Nandor Licker
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190901/2c95e8a2/attachment.html>