[llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions

Zachary Turner via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 18 12:44:06 PST 2019


Discourse archives are not searchable on the web.

Unsurprisingly, this discussion thread is evolving almost exactly like the
Chromium thread where Slack was introduced a few years ago.  Half the
people are concerned about losing the mailing list, missing conversations
that don't occur in their time zone, and fragmentation.  The other half are
saying "it's just like what IRC is today only more modern".

And I think, much like what happened during the Chromium proposal, we
should make it clear that replacing mailing lists is a non-starter and not
open for discussion.  It should be clear that this is basically just a more
modern IRC.  Framed that way, it almost doesn't even seem worth discussing
*whether* it should happen, because I can't think of a good reason for it
*not* to.  Instead, we should just switch to focusing on the how.  Is it
Discord, Discourse, Slack, or something else?

If someone has a concern that is unique to Discord/Discourse/Slack that
doesn't exist in today's IRC world, we can certainly discuss that, but so
far I haven't seen anything along those lines in this thread.

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:48 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>> +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication
>> channels such
>> as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here)
>> for
>> informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is includes user
>> questions but also questions that can be easily answered using community
>> knowledge. I think of things like "How to I build clang for option abc" or
>> "How do I access all instructions in a basic block?"
>>
>> Strong -1 for any attempts to replace the mailing list (but no strong
>> opinion on
>> providing additional possibilities to interact with it, such as mirrored
>> forums
>> etc.) as primary and definitive communication channel.
>>
>> It should be absolutely enough to follow llvm-dev to be completely
>> informed
>> about any major RFC, discussion or design decisions.
>>
>
> If your concern is to be able to stay informed by email, then subscribing
> to the right "category" on Discourse should provide exactly this (everyone
> can select their notification preferences on Discourse).
> Is there something more you need that I missed?
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>
>>
>>     David
>>
>> On 18. Nov 2019, at 08:48, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>> *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat
>> (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email
>> lists):
>> https://discord.gg/xS7Z362
>> https://llvm.discourse.group/
>>
>> Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up
>> and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to
>> this thread with any issues you see or things you want to fix. Also, both
>> services have dedicated feedback channels.
>>
>> Do feel free to use Discourse for technical discussions, although try not
>> to create duplicate discussions (any more than you would between the lists
>> and Bugzilla) and make sure the people you're having the discussion with
>> are fine using Discourse instead of the email list. In case Discourse
>> doesn't work out, we'll collect and archive everything so it isn't lost.
>>
>>
>> *Longer version & more details:*During this year's Women in Compilers
>> and Tools meeting, folks expressed very clearly that our communication
>> systems cause a non-trivial amount of friction for new people trying to
>> find out about, learn, or contribute to LLVM. Both IRC for chatting and
>> mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, and
>> often intimidating for newcomers. While I have long been a fan and
>> resistant to change in these areas, the feedback from folks at WiCT was
>> compelling and important for us as a community to address. Even if it means
>> I have to let go of my precious IRC. ;]
>>
>> We talked to a bunch of people and looked at the options out there and
>> the most promising ones were Discord for chatting and Discourse for
>> longer-form discussions. Meike and I have set up both an initial Discord
>> and Discourse server. You can find them here:
>> https://discord.gg/xS7Z362
>> https://llvm.discourse.group/
>>
>> There is still a lot of work to be done. Notably, it'd be great for folks
>> to clean up and improve the summaries for each of the groups in Discourse,
>> and I'll be asking various people to help moderate on both Discourse and
>> Discord. If you'd like to help out with a specific set of improvements to
>> these, don't hesitate to reach out to me or Meike and we can get you set
>> up. Some specific things we're already working on:
>>
>>    - Getting Discord verified with a nice URL.
>>    - Archives of mailing lists on Discourse so you can search in one
>>    place, etc.
>>       - See the plan here:
>>       https://llvm.discourse.group/t/mirroring-and-archiving-llvm-mailing-lists-on-discourse/61
>>    - Moving Discourse to forums.llvm.org.
>>    - Documenting the best way to move to Discourse while preserving a
>>    similarly email-focused workflow.
>>
>>
>> We're just adding these for now, but I'd like people to seriously try
>> using them. While IRC has served us fairly well, I think it is one of the
>> bigger barriers to entry. Our email lists are more effective, but also have
>> had serious infrastructure challenges over the years: a constant flow of
>> spam, bouncing for several major email providers, etc. Discourse has very
>> powerful email-based workflows available and I think we should seriously
>> consider moving to Discourse long-term instead of the email lists.
>>
>> I also want to say thanks to all the folks at the WiCT workshop for
>> giving me and others feedback. I was pretty set in my ways around these
>> kind of things, but hearing the kinds of challenges this has posed to
>> people less established in the community was a real eye opener. It takes a
>> lot to speak up like this, and I really appreciate it. I hope this also
>> helps start to address these long-standing issues. Also a huge thanks to
>> Tanya for organizing the WICT workshop and Meike for helping drive this
>> message home to me and doing a bunch of the work getting these things set
>> up. I wouldn't have been able to do it without her help, especially around
>> Discord bots.
>>
>> -Chandler
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191118/cd104b86/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list