[llvm-dev] RFC: llvm-readelf Mach-O & COFF options
Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 27 11:43:28 PDT 2019
My perspective is that llvm-readobj is a testing tool whose goal should be
to make testing LLVM easy, not 100% GNU readelf compatibility, but I think
that ship has sailed.
I don't really care if you decide to move the functionality, I just want to
have some binary in LLVM for exploratory dumpers, where I don't have to
care too much about consistency with another tool that makes different
arbitrary formatting decisions. So, if you want to move it, I guess we need
some new binary where we can put experimental code. "llvm-objutil"
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:03 AM James Henderson via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> llvm-readelf is an alias for llvm-readobj which aims for GNU compatibility
> and is likely the tool that most people migrating to the LLVM binutils will
> adopt instead of llvm-readobj. Because it is just an alias, it has
> inherited the functionality provided by llvm-readobj, including for non-ELF
> targets, with Mach-O and COFF-specific switches available in its interface.
> People migrating from GNU readelf won't need these switches.
> I have a change up for review to expand the documentation for llvm-readelf
> to list all its supported switches (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D63826).
> This patch currently includes the Mach-O and COFF specific switches. It was
> suggested that these could be surprising and unnecessary, and could be
> removed from the patch. If we go ahead and remove them from the
> documentation, I think we should remove them from the help text, or
> possibly even the available options entirely. I'd be happy to do the work
> for this, if the community agrees that llvm-readelf should only support
> ELF-related options.
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev