[llvm-dev] RFC: Removal of Nios2 backend

Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 15 02:13:41 PST 2019


I don't really have a preference for doing it before or after the
release branch. If the patches are ready, landing them sounds good to
me.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:04 AM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +Hans Wennborg +tstellar at redhat.com for release thoughts....
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:03 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> As far as I could tell, the only non-Intel contributions were from mechanical API updates or fixing include paths when files moved to other libraries for layering.
>>
>> I'm happy to do it on whatever side of the branch people prefer.
>>
>> ~Craig
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:36 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> FWIW, I support this especially as it doesn't build.
>>>
>>> If someone wants to revive it, removing it won't actually make that much harder (if at all) given that they'd need to clean up the build as well.
>>>
>>> Are there any other (non-Intel) devs who contributed significantly or might have specific opinions about this?
>>>
>>> Does it make more sense to this before or after the branch?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:25 PM Craig Topper via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Patches up
>>>>
>>>> Clang: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56690
>>>> LLVM: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56691
>>>>
>>>> ~Craig
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:51 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We (Intel) would like to propose removal of the Nios2 backend from the repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is currently considered an experimental target. The implementation is not complete and months went by without anyone noticing it doesn't build. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D56178
>>>>>
>>>>> Due to internal priority changes, it doesn't look like it will become more maintained in the near future. So I would like to propose removing it from the repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will put together a patch for review shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~Craig
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list