[llvm-dev] Removing LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE from ADT classes

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 4 15:41:42 PST 2019

One minor correction, this isn't about ADT.

There are *numerous* places where we've tried to mitigate -O0 test runtime
with these attributes that will end up cleaned up based on this direction,
not just in ADT. =D

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I would like to propose, based on a previous discussion on llvm-dev,
> the following change.
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D56337
> The main motivation for annotating member functions of ADT clases with
> LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE  was that of speeding up `check-llvm` at `-O0`.
> Turns out this significantly degrades the debuggability of fundamental
> classes in llvm itself, e.g. StringRef or SmallVector.
> After discussing we agreed that it's reasonable to drop
> LLVM_ALWYAS_INLINE from ADT classes  member functions and add a note
> in the developer's manual.
> If you have any feedbacks or concerns, please speak up.
> If nothing major arises, I'm going to commit this patch in a week (or
> such).
> Thanks for your time,
> --
> Davide
> "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
> or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190104/b73cb97f/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list