[llvm-dev] [9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 7 04:10:44 PDT 2019
There's no fundamental reason more than that the script is old (from
before lld had Windows support) and hasn't been updated to use lld for
the bootstrap. I gave it a quick try but ran into problems linking the
openmp library. I was probably holding it wrong, but I probably won't
try to change the script during the release process. It would be nice
to bootstrap with lld in the future, though.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:49 PM Russell Gallop <russell.gallop at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> It looks like this batch file is self hosting with clang-cl but not using lld-link to link the packaged binaries, despite building it in stage0. Is that correct? If so, is there a reason why this can't use lld-link?
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 08:26, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:32 PM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> > 9.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r367217
>> > (tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 in the Git monorepo).
>> > Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc1
>> > Binaries will be added as they become available.
>> > Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of
>> > https://llvm.org/PR42474
>> > Release testers: please start your engines, run the script, share your
>> > results, and upload binaries.
>> Windows is ready:
>> $ sha256sum LLVM-9.0.0-rc1-win*.exe
>> They were built with the attached batch file.
>> Because of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42724, the binaries
>> don't include LLDB.
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the llvm-dev