[llvm-dev] [RFC] migrating LLVM to C++14
Lang Hames via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 8 15:05:02 PDT 2019
> - Initialized/Generalized lambda captures (init-capture)
> - Without restriction.
> Fantastic! I will have a lot of FIXMEs to remove.
Thanks for working on this JF!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:20 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2019, at 1:57 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 16:16, JF Bastien via llvm-dev
> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >> I haven’t documented FreeBSD / NetBSD / Fedora / MacOS / MSVC, and
> nobody complained at the BoF. I’d like to understand if we should care
> about documenting these: ideally the toolchain update policy would list
> which platforms need to be considered and how far back in time is relevant.
> > FreeBSD is one of the earlier consistent users of Clang and represents
> > a large installed base; "we" should care about FreeBSD's tool chain.
> I wasn’t saying that we shouldn’t care, just that nobody had spoken up…
> and nobody had since I sent the email on January 22nd… until now :-)
> > I see your table goes back to 2003 in some cases; I have no interest
> > in collecting information for FreeBSD versions that are long since
> > unsupported by the project.
> > For recent FreeBSD versions I believe we have:
> > FreeBSD version / LLVM version / Release date / Support end date
> > 10.4 / 3.4.1 / 2017-10 / ended Oct 31, 2018
> > 11.1 / 4.0.0 / 2017-07 / ended Sep 30, 2018
> > 11.2 / 6.0.0 / 2018-06 / current
> > 12.0 / 6.0.1 / 2018-12 / current
> IIUC FreeBSD is fine because LLVM 6 and above are the only compilers it
> currently supports? That’s great news.
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev