[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?

[Philip Reames via llvm-dev]

+1 to WebAssembly

For RISCV, I'd prefer to see a proposal from Alex, but I could believe 
we're ready.


On 09/19/2018 03:05 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> For reference, these are the targets currently marked experimental:
>   ARC, AVR, Nios2, RISCV, WebAssembly.
>
> I think RISCV ought to be moved out of the "experimental" list, too.
> (cc += asb, for comment)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:47 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev 
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being
>     actively worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make
>     it a normal target so that it gets tested on a regular basis.
>     (Most recent random breakage is
>     https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web
>     assembly enabled).
>
>     Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone
>     raises a strong objection here.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     -eric
>     _______________________________________________
>     LLVM Developers mailing list
>     llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>     http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/97e09386/attachment.html>