[llvm-dev] DebugInfo proposal: Emit an explicit empty address range on CUs with no code addresses

[Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev]

> On Nov 28, 2018, at 9:50 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > a) decide that a unit without ranges covers no ranges - and don't do the search
> 
> Are there compilers that do this ("forget" to emit ranges) that we care to support with llvm-symbolizer?
> 
> I'm not specifically aware of any, though haven't gone looking.

Just in case this wasn't obvious in the sub-text:
I think we should figure out whether this assumption in llvm-symbolizer is actually needed to support a compiler we care about and then potentially remove it, or enforce it only when the CU is < DWARF 5 or something like that.

-- adrian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181128/7c8438b4/attachment.html>