[llvm-dev] [RFC] Enable Partial Inliner by default
Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 29 12:00:05 PST 2018
Thank you for reminding me.
It looks like it get lost among tons of emails and other tasks.
I’ll check if the code size issues still exist.
From: Sean Fertile <sd.fertile at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 19:52
To: Florian Hahn <Florian.Hahn at arm.com>
Cc: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com>, Graham Yiu <gyiu at ca.ibm.com>, "junbuml at codeaurora.org" <junbuml at codeaurora.org>, "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Tobias Grosser <tobias.grosser at inf.ethz.ch>, nd <nd at arm.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Enable Partial Inliner by default
This conversations seems to have fizzled out and I would like to try to revive it. My intention is to pick up where Graham left off with enabling partial-inlining by default.
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
On 13/11/2017 14:47, Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev wrote:
I created a bug report with a reproducer for the failures I’ve got: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35288
That bug should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/rL320199
Thanks for fixing this Florian. Now that this is no longer blocking, are there other concerns over enabling PI by default?
Evgeny, did you get a chance to look into the code-size regressions on AArch targets? What do you think about moving ahead with this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev