[llvm-dev] Hitting kMaxNumChunks

[Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Frederik Deweerdt <
frederik.deweerdt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Kostya,
>
> I see that master has the same value for kMaxNumChunks, is there
> anything in particular that leads you to think i wouldn't run into the
> same limit?
>

No. It's just that I haven't heard anyone else complain recently.
If you have a reproducer that works on trunk, I'll be happy to look at it.

--kcc


>
> Thanks,
> Frederik
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:
> > llvm 3.9 seems pretty old.
> > Does this happen with trunk?
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Frederik Deweerdt via llvm-dev
> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We've had a build that hit the following assert:
> >> AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
> >>
> >> /var/lib/jenkins/jenkins/workspace/fst-clang/local/src/
> llvm/llvm-3.9.0.src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../
> sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:1078
> >> "((idx)) < ((kMaxNumChunks))" (0x40000, 0x40000)
> >>
> >> Increasing the limit and recompiling seems like the obvious
> >> workaround, but I'm wondering if i have better options than that. Any
> >> thoughts?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Frederik
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180116/d3677040/attachment.html>