[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Proposal] Automatically Cc: cfe-commits@ on Clang reviews
Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 22 08:23:38 PST 2017
+llvm-dev, so we get wider input :)
Given how unfortunate reviews that are started without cc'ing the right
list are (basically folks need to re-send the review from scratch), I
support this idea.
Ben, couldn't rL still be available for all projects? (and be the main
project for LLVM).
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:18 PM Ben Hamilton via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> OK. I confirmed that Stephan's process to send out cross-repo diffs from
> the monorepo is not affected by my proposal.
> tl;dr: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40312 (which was sent out on top of
> D40179 to emulate what happens with a monorepo after my proposal lands).
> Steps I took (starting with
> % git clone https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/
> % cd llvm-project
> % cp llvm/.arcconfig .
> % mkdir -p .git/info
> % echo .arcconfig >> .git/info/exclude
> # Manually apply D40179 into the clang-tools-extra directory
> % arc export --revision D40179 --git | patch -d clang-tools-extra -p1
> patching file .arcconfig
> % git diff
> diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/.arcconfig b/clang-tools-extra/.arcconfig
> index f846581763e..d4a00161bce 100644
> --- a/clang-tools-extra/.arcconfig
> +++ b/clang-tools-extra/.arcconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> - "project_id" : "clang-tools-extra",
> + "repository.callsign" : "CTE",
> "conduit_uri" : "https://reviews.llvm.org/"
> % git commit -a -m "Differential Revision:
> % echo "Test 1" >> llvm/README.txt
> % echo "Test 2" >> clang-tools-extra/README.txt
> % git commit -a -m "[Test] Monorepo test diff crossing Differential
> % arc diff --create --reviewers sberg HEAD^
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:00 AM Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>
>> On 11/21/2017 03:41 PM, Ben Hamilton wrote:
>> > > My understanding was that, while there currently is no official
>> > monorepo, it is at least possible and accepted to send single,
>> > cross-repo patches for review. That would no longer be possible, right?
>> > I assume cross-repo patches would be constructed by hand, right? Or do
>> > you mean using the unofficial monorepo from 2016
>> > <https://github.com/joker-eph/llvm-project>?
>> I'm using <https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507> (as
>> advertised at
>> where such a "cross-repo diff" is just a matter of a plain 'git diff'.
>> > An example of an existing cross-repo review in Differential would be
>> > nice—do you happen to have one handy?
>> I just happened to file <https://reviews.llvm.org/D40295> a moment ago,
>> spanning clang and compiler-rt.
>> > I think either way, we'd keep the ability to send cross-repo patches to
>> > the top-level LLVM repo just the same way you could today.
>> > I'll confirm that if you can help me construct an example cross-repo
>> > patch for review.
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev