[llvm-dev] [RFC] lld: Dropping TLS relaxations in favor of TLSDESC
Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 8 09:38:38 PST 2017
Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:27:37PM -0800, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev wrote:
>> tl;dr: TLSDESC have solved most problems in formerly inefficient TLS access
>> models, so I think we can drop TLS relaxation support from lld.
> I've skipped over the description and I have some difficulty sharing
> this conlusion. I don't see how it makes any significant difference. I
> also don't know if any system beyond glibc implements it.
musl implements it.
More information about the llvm-dev