[llvm-dev] LibFuzzer syntax sugar flag

Dan Liew via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 9 10:36:20 PDT 2017


On 8 May 2017 at 18:30, George Karpenkov via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> The offline consensus was in favor of -fsanitize=fuzzer in order to group it
> together with other runtime verification tools.

SGTM. LibFuzzer requires SanitizerCoverage to work so (at least from
my perspective) it makes sense that is associated with the Sanitizers.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list