[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Your help needed: List of LLVM Open Projects 2017
Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 16 13:13:15 PST 2017
The list can't ommit clang-tidy.
There are many ideas about new checks on llvm bugzilla.
Everything matching ".*Feature Request.*"
2017-01-16 21:31 GMT+01:00 Sean Silva via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> Do we have any open projects on LLD?
> I know we usually try to avoid any big "projects" and mainly add/fix
> things in response to user needs, but just wondering if somebody has any
> Some really generic/simple stuff I can think of:
> 1. trying out LLD on a large program corpus and reporting/reducing/fixing
> bugs (e.g. contributing to the FreeBSD effort or trying to build a bunch of
> packages from a linux distro like Debian or Gentoo)
> 2. performance analysis and optimization of LLD
> 3. getting LLD to link a bootable Linux kernel and/or GRUB
> 4. write an input verifier such that LLD can survive intensive fuzzing
> with no crashes / fatal errors  when the verifier says the input is
> okay. This will allow us to measure what the overhead of doing this
> actually is.
>  As of the latest LLD discussion (in the thread "[llvm-dev] LLD status
> update and performance chart") it sounds like people are okay with LLD
> treating fatal errors the same way that LLVM uses assertions; for inputs
> from the C++ API, we can document to not pass corrupted object files. For
> inputs read from files, there is still community interest in at least
> having the option to run a "verifier" to validate the inputs. I think the
> best way to approach the verifier is to essentially follow the approach
> suggested by Peter (in the context of "hardening") in
> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30540#c5 i.e. getting to the point
> where LLD can survive intensive fuzzing.
> -- Sean Silva
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Vassil Vassilev via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> Happy new year!
>> Last LLVM Developers' Meeting I had a BoF: 'Raising Next Generation
>> LLVM Developers'. It was suggested that we should update our open projects
>> page and possibly restructure it a little bit.
>> I volunteered to do this work and I need your help.
>> Chandler and I started working on a google doc . We pinged few code
>> owners asking them to list of work items we should get done in 2017 but we
>> do not have the manpower. Now we would like to ask for your input, too.
>> I believe an up to date list can serve as a good entry point for
>> students, interns and new contributors.
>> Feel free to propose a new item or comment under an existing one. I
>> expect to start gradually updating the page beginning of Feb.
>> -- Vassil
>>  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YLK_xINSg1Ei0w8w39uAMR1n
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev