[llvm-dev] llvm-dev Digest, Vol 152, Issue 83

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev]

The document is outdated and needs updating. That's my negligence. I'm
planning to update/rewrite that.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:05 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com>
wrote:

> >Actually I think now is a good timing to start including LLD as a OS
> >package as it got mature enough to be used in daily basis. Our release
> >schedule and version number are coupled with the entire LLVM release, so
> it
> >is LLD 4.0, but if it were an independent project, we'd probably be
> >seriously thinking about naming it LLD 1.0 this time.
>
> I think it may worth to update information on next page:
> http://lld.llvm.org/NewLLD.html
>
> It says: "The ELF support is in progress and is able to link large
> programs such as Clang or LLD itself. Unless your program depends on linker
> scripts, you can expect it to be linkable with LLD. ...".
> I noticed that people are sharing this link when talk about LLD. It may
> lead to little misunderstanding, since I think linkerscripts are not a
> problem anymore. Also probably wording "in progress" may be changed so
> something more close to "mostly complete" ?
>
> George
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170221/b712b8aa/attachment.html>