[llvm-dev] Upstreaming utils/kate/llvm.xml

Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 28 10:04:40 PST 2017


I would guess because LLVM IR highlighting would be of interest only to LLVM developers, who would all have LLVM checked out anyway.  Also the textual syntax isn't guaranteed stable long-term, and it would be an additional maintenance burden on LLVM developers to make KDE patches.  I'm suspicious that even the version in the LLVM tree is not current, as it hasn't been updated in several years.
--paulr

From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Gleb Popov via llvm-dev
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 10:57 AM
To: LLVM Dev
Subject: [llvm-dev] Upstreaming utils/kate/llvm.xml

Hello. I'm KDE developer and while poking around LLVM, I've stumbled upon LLVM IR syntax definition for Kate. Is there any reason why hasn't this been upstreamed ( https://phabricator.kde.org/source/syntax-highlighting/repository/master/ )?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171228/e89120c0/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list