[llvm-dev] [RFC] 'Review corner' section in LLVM Weekly

[Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev]

I would like to add my support for this effort and take the opportunity to
thank you Alex for not only offering to do something about this issue, but
for all the incredibly valuable work you do with LLVM Weekly.
Although I keep a fairly close eye on llvm-dev, I frequently find stuff in
LLVM Weekly that I find worth a closer look.

I am not sure how common this is, but I simply can't keep up with
llvm-commits, so I don't try to. If I am not a subscriber/reviewer on a
patch, I don't know it exists. I believe the "Review Corner" would be an
awesome addition to the summary you send out on Mondays.

One thing I'd like to bring up is the cadence of re-appearance of patches
in the review corner. I believe it wouldn't necessarily be useful to
disqualify patches from future inclusion if they've been included before.
OTOH, I think having the same patches there every week wouldn't be very
useful either.

Thanks once again for the work you do with LLVM Weekly.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
> Alex
> > Bradbury via llvm-dev
> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 10:02 AM
> > To: Hans Wennborg
> > Cc: llvm-dev
> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] 'Review corner' section in LLVM Weekly
> >
> > On 28 August 2017 at 17:49, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org>
> > wrote:
> > > What I was thinking when I replied to your tweet was something like
> > > "bugs filed in the last 7 days which no-one seems to have looked at",
> > > or something similar. Hopefully it should be possible to build the
> > > list automatically.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how large that list would be each week though, or how
> > > useful it would be. Also, this might be something we should fix by
> > > having a better bug triaging process in general.
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. Trying to improve bug triage problem
> > seems like a manageable proposition. I'd guess it's already possible
> > to construct a bugzilla query showing bugs filed in the past 7 days
> > that haven't been triaged?
> >
> > Something like the following?:
> >
> > """
> > ## Bug corner
> >
> > In the past 7 days, XXX bugs have been opened, YYY bugs have been
> > closed. ZZZ newly-filed bugs remain untriaged - see <link> to help.
> > Thanks to contributions from CREDIT1, ..., CREDITN, AAA out of BBB
> > bugs were triaged last week.
> > """
>
> As I reported back in June, the overall LLVM open bug count increases
> by an average of 4 per day.  I don't know how many of the bugs that
> stay open get comments, but this gives you a reasonable upper bound
> on the size of this kind of weekly summary.
> --paulr
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170829/b0295b3f/attachment.html>