[llvm-dev] llvm-pdbdump proposal

Adrian McCarthy via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 10 08:13:24 PDT 2017


Since Phabricator isn't sending email:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D31832

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:

> This is exactly how clang's type printer works, so I'd say this is
> probably the right implementation strategy. :)
>
> Check out clang/lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp:
>   class TypePrinter {
> ...
>     void printBefore(const Type *ty, Qualifiers qs, raw_ostream &OS);
>     void printBefore(QualType T, raw_ostream &OS);
>     void printAfter(const Type *ty, Qualifiers qs, raw_ostream &OS);
>     void printAfter(QualType T, raw_ostream &OS);
> ...
> #define ABSTRACT_TYPE(CLASS, PARENT)
> #define TYPE(CLASS, PARENT) \
>     void print##CLASS##Before(const CLASS##Type *T, raw_ostream &OS); \
>     void print##CLASS##After(const CLASS##Type *T, raw_ostream &OS);
> #include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.def"
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Adrian McCarthy via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> I came across a PDB that caused llvm-pdbdump to crash.  I tracked it down
>> to a missing overload for a data type in the variable printer.  When I
>> tried to provide an implementation, I discovered that there were some bugs
>> in the existing overloads and it was easy to come up with combinations of
>> types that weren't being dumped right.  I created some test cases and tried
>> to fix these problems but realized that there's a limitation to how
>> printing the type information is structured.
>>
>> The cause of the difficulty is the conflict between these two facts:
>>
>> 1.  C and C++ variable declarations are described inside-out
>> 2.  Printing with color requires printing left-to-right
>>
>> Simple types generally work, because all the type information is on the
>> left side, so VariableDumper can just work left-to-right.  To handle more
>> complex types (like arrays and function signatures), VariableDumper
>> attempts to special case the complex types.  Unfortunately, the special
>> cases can't be combined generally (e.g., making an array of pointers to
>> functions), so it's always possible to find a new bug by adding an extra
>> layer of type information.
>>
>> I'm proposing a restructure of VariableDumper (PrettyVariableDumper.cpp)
>> that I think should allow for pretty-printing of all types and actually
>> simplify away most of the special-case code.
>>
>> The existing approach is to emit the type information for a symbol and
>> then the identifier, using recursion as necessary to emit the type
>> information of subtypes.  For example, if foo is a pointer to an int, it's
>> dumped by first recursively dumping the pointee type (int), then the '*',
>> and then the name (foo).  But if bar is a pointer to an array of ints, this
>> breaks down.
>>
>> My proposal is to extend this slightly by having dumpers for the
>> "left-side" and the "right-side" of the type information.  The pattern for
>> printing a variable them becomes:
>>
>>     call dumpLeft with the symbol type
>>     emit the symbol name
>>     call dumpRight with the symbol type
>>
>> Most of the dumpLeft implementations would be identical to the current
>> dump implementations.  The default for a dumpRight implementation would be
>> to emit nothing, but for arrays and function signatures, dumpRight would
>> print the bracketed array size and argument lists.  This depth-first order
>> of the recursion should produce the necessary output in order, which means
>> there should be no change to how we stream the output in color.
>>
>> Any questions, comments, objections?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170410/77aacabf/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list