[llvm-dev] compiler-rt, v4.0: arm\udivsi3.S broken for division by zero

Renato Golin via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 5 04:44:15 PDT 2017

On 5 April 2017 at 12:40, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> IMO it shouldn't. But it is kind of difficult to provide a good
> implementation in general as it will depend on system-specific
> interfaces, i.e. to raise the signal.

I think that was the reasoning behind the decision to return. Let
systems that care about it dictate their own behaviour and default to
the softest reaction possible.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list