[llvm-dev] (Thin)LTO llvm build

[Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
wrote:

> I just built a stage-1 compiler from the 3.9 release bits and built the
> lldb from head sources which worked fine. Let me try again using 3.9 build
> compiler to build 3.9 bits. Teresa
>

Nevermind - it looks like I didn't actually get the 3.9 bits. Anyone know
how to get 3.9 via git or git-svn? Typically I use git svn like so to get
trunk bits:

    git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git llvm_${num}
    cd llvm_${num}
    git svn init https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk
--username=tejohnson
    git config svn-remote.svn.fetch :refs/remotes/origin/master
    git svn rebase -l

I attempted to get 3.9 bits by modifying this slightly (the git svn init
command):

    git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git llvm_39_${num}
    cd llvm_39_${num}
    git svn init https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_39
--username=tejohnson
    git config svn-remote.svn.fetch :refs/remotes/origin/master
    git svn rebase -l

However, I still see latest trunk.

Teresa


> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, 2:38 PM Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Sure, I will try this and let you know. Unfortunately, though, I
>>> > have another big work commitment that is going to eat up most of my
>>> > time through Thu, although I may be able to find some time to try
>>> > it.
>>>
>>> No worries, if I get around it before you do, I will :).
>>>
>>> > I think so - what is confusing me is that your cmake command is
>>> > specifying the same $PREFIX for both the install destination and the
>>> > source of the llvm-ar/llvm-ranlib that will be used in the new
>>> > build. Should the llvm-ar/llvm-ranlib in the cmake command use your
>>> > moved-to PREFIX instead?
>>>
>>> Only if 'ninja install` would reference the two executables. If that's
>>> case, and I haven't gotten that far yet due to ThinLTO not finishing,
>>> I'll consider copying those to the local build tree first.
>>>
>>> > Can you nm the .so files in your lib dir and see if any reference
>>> > __morestack?
>>>
>>> $ for so in lib/*.so; do echo $so ; nm $so|grep __morestack;done
>>> lib/BugpointPasses.so
>>> lib/libclang.so
>>> lib/libgomp.so
>>> lib/libiomp5.so
>>> lib/liblldb.so
>>>                  U __morestack
>>> lib/libLTO.so
>>> lib/libomp.so
>>> lib/LLVMgold.so
>>> lib/LLVMHello.so
>>> lib/LLVMPolly.so
>>>
>>> Looks like liblldb.so does. Does that explain anything?
>>>
>>
>> Interesting, it doesn't in my build. Let me think about what might
>> trigger that difference...
>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Teresa Johnson |  Software Engineer |  tejohnson at google.com |
> 408-460-2413
>



-- 
Teresa Johnson |  Software Engineer |  tejohnson at google.com |  408-460-2413
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160930/85bc834c/attachment.html>