[llvm-dev] A new code coverage bot

Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 22 11:21:53 PDT 2016


I'm testing this out and will let you know when it works.

vedant

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Would it be possible to add lld to the mix? :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
> On 22 September 2016 at 13:05, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'd like to announce a new code coverage bot:
>> 
>>    http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html
>> 
>> The purpose of the bot is to make high-quality coverage reports available to
>> llvm developers, and to provide additional testing for clang's code coverage
>> implementation.
>> 
>> The coverage data clang generates allows the reporting tool to render execution
>> counts for code regions nested within lines or macros. The tool is also capable
>> of displaying coverage information for each instantiation of a function.
>> 
>> The bot runs "check-{llvm,clang}" with an instrumented version of the latest
>> top-of-tree compiler. It generates new reports roughly every four hours. These
>> reports can be used to find dead code, find fishy code, and to gauge the
>> effectiveness of our smoke tests.
>> 
>> If you have any feedback about the bot or the coverage reports, please let me
>> know!
>> 
>> vedant
>> 
>> p.s: There is already a coverage bot which runs "check-all" and uses gcov. If
>> you'd prefer those reports, you can find them here --
>> 
>>    http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list