[llvm-dev] Comments sent via mail are not imported into Phabricator web

Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 14 10:20:06 PDT 2016


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:18 AM Kuba Brecka <kuba.brecka at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Manuel,
>
> I believe you're maintaining Phabricator at reviews.llvm.org.  Duncan
> likes to send his patch comments via email, like in the example below.  Do
> you know why don't his replies get imported into the web interface?  The
> reply was sent to "reviews+D24569+public+a5763c0a090df06f at reviews.llvm.org",
> and I bet that the purpose of this weird address is to match the revision
> this reply belongs to.  I never saw any email reply actually appear in the
> web interface, and that sounds like a server misconfiguration.
>
> Or is that something that Phabricator just doesn't support?
>

Correct, phab doesn't support in-line replies. Would be great to add it,
but it's quite a bit of development work.
Generally, email is the system of record, and phab exists to make email
based reviews more convenient.


>
> Thanks,
> Kuba
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *"Duncan P. N. Exon Smith" <dexonsmith at apple.com>
> *Subject: **Re: [PATCH] D24569: [libcxx] Allow sanitizing libcxx with
> ASan+UBSan simultaneously*
> *Date: *14 September 2016 at 19:01:29 GMT+2
> *To: *reviews+D24569+public+a5763c0a090df06f at reviews.llvm.org
> *Cc: *kuba.brecka at gmail.com, eric at efcs.ca, compnerd at compnerd.org,
> filcab+llvm.phabricator at gmail.com, beanz at apple.com, zaks.anna at gmail.com,
> mgorny at gentoo.org
>
>
> On 2016-Sep-14, at 09:39, Kuba Brecka <kuba.brecka at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> kubabrecka added inline comments.
>
> ================
> Comment at: test/libcxx/test/config.py:628
> @@ +627,3 @@
> +                    self.cxx.flags += ['-fsanitize=undefined',
>
>
> Shouldn't this be '-fsanitize="undefined;address"'?
>
> +
>                                       '-fno-sanitize=vptr,function,float-divide-by-zero',
> +                                       '-fno-sanitize-recover=all']
>
>
> Can this be refactored to avoid code duplication with the UBSan changes?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160914/b8da959f/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list