[llvm-dev] What was the IR made for precisely?

[David Chisnall via llvm-dev]

On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:10, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:59 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> On 28 Oct 2016, at 09:46, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct?
>>>> 
>>>> This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR and there are a lot of proposals to fix it.  It would be great if the LLVM Foundation would fund someone to do the work, as it isn’t a sufficiently high priority for any of the large LLVM consumers and would make a huge difference to the utility of LLVM for a lot of people.
>>> 
>>> It seems to me that it could be a good fit for the scope of a GSoC project.
>> 
>> I think it would be difficult to do it within the timescale of the GSoC unless the student was already an experienced LLVM developer.  It would likely involve designing some good APIs (difficult!), refactoring a bunch of Clang code, and creating a new LLVM library.  I’ve not seen a GSoC project on this scale succeed in any of the open source projects that I’ve been involved with.  If we had a good design doc and a couple of engaged mentors then it might stand a chance.
> 
> I agree with all of this, especially we need a well thought proposal and engaged mentors to conduct this. We could also “staged it” by having intermediate milestone for the project, and spawn this over multiple GSoC.

I would be very happy to be engaged with the design and to co-mentor a student if we have anyone who looks as if they might be able to do it!

David