[llvm-dev] Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?
David Blaikie via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 25 15:44:49 PDT 2016
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Would it make sense to officially have phabricator ignore all replies to
> the email thread, and instead require that all comments are done through
> phabricator itself?
The official stance is that people should be able to interact with reviews
from the mailing list without ever registering for/using Phab, so that
probably isn't acceptable.
> On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring
>> replies. This one seems to be a different issue.
>> In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in
>> assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all
>> of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s
>> does have a way to carry the location.".
>> Except for the latest "test" email, where I moved the phab address from
>> the "Cc" line to the "To" line. It seems to have gotten that. So maybe
>> it ignores emails unless it sees itself in "To:"???
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org
>> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>> On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email?
>> > they make it through, but sometimes not.
>> Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do:
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by The Linux Foundation
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev