[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Smith, Kevin B via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 6 13:33:38 PDT 2016
>From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
>Renato Golin via llvm-dev
>Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:20 PM
>To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
>Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM
>code of conduct
>On 6 May 2016 at 20:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That said, I wonder what folks think about strengthening the
>> "de-intensifying" language? As a small change that might help:
>> "In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may, in rare
>> cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them."
>I prefer this change.
I've mostly kept out of this, but I think that is an excellent change.
>LLVM Developers mailing list
>llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the llvm-dev