[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 5 12:13:42 PDT 2016
Am 05.05.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev:
> there seems to be pretty widespread support for the general
> direction, and most of the comments on the current wording are important
> but relatively narrow in scope.
You're counting votes here, not building a consensus.
I do not think that that's a good idea, though obviously you disagree.
More information about the llvm-dev