[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3
C Bergström via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 3 08:12:11 PDT 2016
I'm not sure if they are doing an x86 to IA64 cross compile, but in
any event I'm going to guess they may need an ancient version to avoid
any C++11 dependencies. In terms of IA64 compilers you have afaik 3
choices HP compiler, Open64 and Intel? (Does gcc still support it and
how up-to-date or EOL is the Intel compiler IA64 support?)
I really hope nobody decides not to move to a more recent version of
cmake because of IA-64.
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:55 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> It sounds like your problem is with having cmake working at all, not which
> version is required...So I'm not sure how requiring an upgrade every year
> could make that any worse.
> If anything, I'd expect you to need a newer version in order to get porting
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:48 PM, John Reagan via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> As one of the OS' without current CMake support, I'm closely watching this
>> discussion. We currently have LLVM 3.4.2 hosted on OpenVMS Itanium (as a
>> host only, x86 target) using configure/make with little hassle. We plan to
>> port CMake to OpenVMS, but that has been trickier than you'd think (others
>> have tried, I haven't found anybody who has done it). Looks like I'll want
>> to visit the cmake-developers list to as we get farther along.
>> The "lets update every year just because" does have ripple effects for us
>> non-traditional platforms.
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the llvm-dev