[llvm-dev] Status of the official LLVM APT repositories

Johan Engelen via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 28 02:48:14 PDT 2016


On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org>
wrote:

> Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit :
>
>
>> > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but
>> > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary
>> > tarballs for Linux with every release at <https://cmake.org/download/>
>> https://cmake.org/download/ .
>> > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for some
>> > other reasons anyways, it's as simple as just unpacking it on the
>> > builder and adding to the front of the PATH variable. I use this
>> > approach on my Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) builders, as a proper backport
>> > simply isn't worth the effort for my purposes, since they are going to
>> > be decommissioned rather soon anyways and it's working very nicely.
>> >
>> I will give it a try.
>>
>>
> Thank you very much for working on this!
> The LDC team is using Travis CI to test LDC against LLVM 3.5-3.9 and we
> depend on these APT repositories: Travis CI is using Ubuntu Precise.
> LLVM 3.8 is available (svn 257166), but LLVM 3.9 is not [1].
>
> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 packages
> are going to be green by next week.
>

Hi Sylvestre,
  Did it work out? Could you give an update on this?
llvm.org/apt still reports the last update was on Jan 8th.

Thanks a lot,
  Johan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160328/c5935d96/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list