[llvm-dev] Regression in SPEC2006/gcc caused by LoopLoadElimination

[Benjamin Kramer via llvm-dev]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
> I’ve committed the fix in r263058.  Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys
> please give it a test with your codebase.  (You need to enable the pass with
> -mllvm -enable-loop-load-elim.)

The miscompilation I was seeing is gone now, too. Thanks!

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 11:05 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Haicheng,
>
> Sorry about the breakage.  I reverted it in r262839.
>
> I will try to reproduce it locally.  Please don’t blow away your directories
> yet in case I need further help.
>
>
> OK, I managed to reproduce this locally.  Should be able to make progress
> from here without further help from you.
>
> Adam
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Haicheng Wu <haicheng at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I find LoopLoadElimination (r262250) causes SPEC2006/gcc generate wrong
> result (166.s) in AArch64 when running with *ref* data set.  The error
> happens when I use either “-Ofast -flto -fuse-ld=gold” or “-O3
> -fno-strict-aliasing”.  Please let me know if you need more information.
>
> Best,
>
> Haicheng
>
>
>
>