[llvm-dev] [iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 0/5] Minor improvements to the bpf backend

Alexei Starovoitov via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 22 10:27:33 PDT 2016

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev
<iovisor-dev at lists.iovisor.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Using EM_NONE for the bpf backend e_machine value is less than optimal.
> With a unique value we can interact with other tools, e.g. objdump for
> disassembly.
> As a bonus, I noticed a few missing patterns that are useful to implement.

Hi Richard,

sounds like em number is now set to 247 and paper work filed?
When should I expect v2 of these patches?
3.9 release branch will be forked mid july.
would be great to get these changes in soon.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list