[llvm-dev] [iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value
Jacques Pienaar via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 16 15:43:42 PDT 2016
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Daniel Borkmann via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 10:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 06/16/2016 12:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> + EM_BPF = 0xeb9f, // Linux kernel bpf virtual machine
>>> Great, can that be assumed the final magic e_machine number for the ELF
>>> header that eBPF loaders can check for as well then (I do like 0xeb9f
>> I'm quite fond of 0xeb9f myself. ;-)
>> I have sent a message to both registry at sco.com and registry at uxsglobal.com
>> We'll see if that produces a response within a reasonable time frame.
>> that, I'm tempted to just use 0xeb9f forever.
> Yeah, sounds good!
I got a response from registry at xinuos.com (registery at sco.com forwards to
there I believe). It took about 6 months to get a number assigned.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev