[llvm-dev] Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume

Lawrence, Peter via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 10 17:59:01 PDT 2016

             Well then my next (dumb?) question is why aren’t we using source level assert information
For optimization ?

--Peter Lawrence.

From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 5:39 PM
To: Lawrence, Peter <c_plawre at qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Lawrence, Peter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
My (dumb?) question would be:  why is llvm.assume being handled any differently than llvm.assert ?

There is no llvm.assert intrinsic, so i'm not sure what you mean here. Care to give an example?

Other than one trapping and one not-trapping, they should be identical, in both cases they are giving
The optimizers information,  and that shouldn’t be any different from being inside an “if” statement with the same condition ?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160611/5c7b8588/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list