[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?
NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 21 10:39:55 PDT 2016
TL;DR, excuse me.
Before we can agree to merge to a single-repo, there's one further question
> that must be resolved:
> Should the layout in the merged repository be:
> 1) Like the "llvm-project" git repository is now:
FYI, the layout can be synthesized with tree objects in each *.git with
> 2) Like the "ideal merged checkout" is now:
I suppose the layout is just standing on "the historical reason".
At least, clang is position-independent. It'd work if clang is not on
$(BUILD_ROOT)/tools/clang, but on $(BUILD_ROOT)/projects/clang.
Since the llvm-project unified tree repo has been unofficial, I didn't
propose any llvm-project-specific things.
I have just been tweaking that makes subprojects not assumed
I think we could take any option, svn, set of single repos, or unified tree.
ATM, I don't agree just to migrate to the single git repo. :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev