[llvm-dev] Consistently prefixing llvm/bin executables

[Davide Italiano via llvm-dev]

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Has it ever been considered to prefix executables like opt, bugpoint,
> obj2yaml, yaml2obj and macho-dump with llvm-?
>

FYI, macho-dump doesn't exist anymore.
That said, I understand the concerns for binutils equivalent (and maybe
opt), but I don't think it's too much a concern for all the other
tools. All the binutils equivalent have llvm- prefix as far as I can tell.
Also, as a downside, prefixing llvm- makes the name more verbose
(which I dislike).

My $0.02,

-- 
Davide

"There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
or less solved" -- Henri Poincare