[llvm-dev] Memory Store/Load Optimization Issue (Emulating stack)
Paul Peet via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 12 03:21:53 PST 2016
Hi again,
So I finally gave up on trying to get through the converting (x86' push pop
mov add) because it deals a lot with crazy pointer arithmetics and sonce
inttoptr and ptrtoint doesn't provide any alias analysis information.
Daniel, you said it doesn't make much sense to provide it but in my cases
it is actually very much needed, you didn't say it wasn't possible to
provide it but it is possible right? Could you guide me through where I
should look to implement such analysis? Would it be complex/non-trivial to
implement such thing?
2016-02-10 21:24 GMT+01:00 Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Paul Peet via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the hint.
>>
>> I adjusted the code and it works:
>>
>> The code after replacing inttoptr with getelementptr:
>>
>> define { i32, i32, i8* } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i8* %sp) {
>> entry:
>> ; push foo (On "stack")
>> %sp_1 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp, i32 -4
>> %sp_1_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_1 to i32*
>> store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4
>>
>> ; push bar
>> %sp_2 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp_1, i32 -4
>> %sp_2_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_2 to i32*
>> store i32 %bar, i32* %sp_2_ptr, align 4
>>
>> ; val1 = pop (val1 = bar)
>> %sp_3_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_2 to i32*
>> %val1 = load i32, i32* %sp_3_ptr, align 4
>> %sp_3 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp_2, i32 4
>>
>> ; val2 = pop (val2 = foo)
>> %sp_4_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_3 to i32*
>> %val2 = load i32, i32* %sp_4_ptr, align 4
>> %sp_4 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp_3, i32 4
>>
>> %ret_1 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } undef, i32 %val1, 0
>> %ret_2 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_1, i32 %val2, 1
>> %ret_3 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_2, i8* %sp_4, 2
>>
>> ret { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_3
>> }
>>
>> After optimization ("opt -instcombine ./code.ll -S")
>>
>> define { i32, i32, i8* } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i8* %sp) {
>> entry:
>> %sp_1 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp, i64 -4
>> %sp_1_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_1 to i32*
>> store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4
>> %sp_2 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp, i64 -8
>> %sp_2_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_2 to i32*
>> store i32 %bar, i32* %sp_2_ptr, align 4
>> %ret_1 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } undef, i32 %bar, 0
>> %ret_2 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_1, i32 %foo, 1
>> %ret_3 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_2, i8* %sp, 2
>> ret { i32, i32, i8* } %ret_3
>> }
>>
>> My only questions are now:
>> - How is it that inttoptr cannot provide that specific alias information
>> so it can optimize that store/load away ?
>>
> Because nothing tracks what happens to the ints, and what happens when
> they are converted back to pointers and whether it's sane :)
>
> http://llvm.org/docs/GetElementPtr.html#how-is-gep-different-from-ptrtoint-arithmetic-and-inttoptr
>
> - Might it be possible to get inttoptr providing such alias analysis ?
>>
> It doesn't make a lot of sense to try in most cases.
> Most of the cases ptrtoint/inttoptr is useful are those where you want to
> do crazy things to the pointer.
>
>
>
>> - I came across MemorySSA while browsing though the llvm source. Is it
>> possible that one can use MemorySSA to do such optimization without alias
>> analysis ?
>>
>
> MemorySSA relies on alias analysis to generate the SSA form.
>
>
>> - Where do I have to look in the source which is doing this kind of
>> optimization (Is it instcombine which uses lib/Analysis/Loads.cpp ?)
>>
>> It's probably a combination of opts. The most likely candidate is -gvn,
> but I would look at the pass dumps after each opt
>
>> Regards,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> 2016-02-10 0:26 GMT+01:00 Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>:
>>
>>> Two points:
>>> - Using inttoptr is a mistake here. GEPs are strongly preferred and
>>> provide strictly more aliasing information to the optimizer.
>>> - The zext is a bit weird. I'm not sure where that came from, but I'd
>>> not bother looking into until the preceding point is addressed.
>>>
>>> In general, you may find these docs useful:
>>> http://llvm.org/docs/Frontend/PerformanceTips.html
>>>
>>> Philip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/08/2016 06:54 AM, Paul Peet via llvm-dev wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to emulate the "stack" as like on x86 when using push/pop so
>>> afterwards I can use LLVM's optimizer passes to simplify (reduce junk) the
>>> code.
>>>
>>> The LLVM IR code:
>>>
>>> define { i32, i32, i32 } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i32 %sp) {
>>> ; push foo (On "stack")
>>> %sp_1 = sub i32 %sp, 4
>>> %sp_1_ptr = inttoptr i32 %sp_1 to i32*
>>> store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4
>>>
>>> ; push bar
>>> %sp_2 = sub i32 %sp_1, 4
>>> %sp_2_ptr = inttoptr i32 %sp_2 to i32*
>>> store i32 %bar, i32* %sp_2_ptr, align 4
>>>
>>> ; val1 = pop (val1 = bar)
>>> %sp_3_ptr = inttoptr i32 %sp_2 to i32*
>>> %val1 = load i32, i32* %sp_3_ptr, align 4
>>> %sp_3 = add i32 %sp_2, 4
>>>
>>> ; val2 = pop (val2 = foo)
>>> %sp_4_ptr = inttoptr i32 %sp_3 to i32*
>>> %val2 = load i32, i32* %sp_4_ptr, align 4
>>> %sp_4 = add i32 %sp_3, 4
>>>
>>> %ret_1 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } undef, i32 %val1, 0
>>> %ret_2 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_1, i32 %val2, 1
>>> %ret_3 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_2, i32 %sp_4, 2
>>>
>>> ret { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_3
>>> }
>>>
>>> This code will "push" two values onto the stack and pop them in reverse
>>> order so afterwards "foo" and "bar" will be swapped and returned back.
>>>
>>> After running this through "opt -O2 ./test.ll", I am getting this:
>>>
>>> define { i32, i32, i32 } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i32 %sp) #0 {
>>> %sp_1 = add i32 %sp, -4
>>> %1 = zext i32 %sp_1 to i64
>>> %sp_1_ptr = inttoptr i64 %1 to i32*
>>> store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4
>>> %sp_2 = add i32 %sp, -8
>>> %2 = zext i32 %sp_2 to i64
>>> %sp_2_ptr = inttoptr i64 %2 to i32*
>>> store i32 %bar, i32* %sp_2_ptr, align 4
>>> %val2 = load i32, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4
>>> %ret_1 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } undef, i32 %bar, 0 ; Swapped
>>> %ret_2 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_1, i32 %val2, 1; Not
>>> Swapped (Not optimized; Should be %foo)
>>> %ret_3 = insertvalue { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_2, i32 %sp, 2
>>> ret { i32, i32, i32 } %ret_3
>>> }
>>>
>>> As you can see that the IR has got additional code, eg. zext. But the
>>> main problem here is that val2 hasn't been optimized.
>>> Could anyone show me some hints what is preventing the second val from
>>> being optimized? (My guess would be the zext because I am using %sp as a
>>> 32bit pointer although the "target" is 64bit).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing listllvm-dev at lists.llvm.orghttp://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160212/12bd77f6/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list