[llvm-dev] How is llvm-avr backound integration going?

[Allen Lorenz via llvm-dev]

To those interested in AVR backend additions to LLVM, the LLVM review tools
"Phabricator" ( don't ask me to say that 3 times fast ),  allows easy
searching.   Go to http://reviews.llvm.org/  and type in AVR in the search
entry.  This will give you a list of the commits, and resolutions.  From my
understanding ( NO Expert ), a large part of the skeleton code has been
added.  The leave the rest of the skeleton,and all the fleshy bits.  Good
progress Dylan!.

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Allen,
>
> Progress is slow but it is happening. It will take a number of more
> releases until it is ready.
>
> Currently the backend is marked as an 'experimental' target, which means
> the only way it can be used is by compiling LLVM from source and passing
> '-DLLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS=AVR' to CMake.
>
> At the moment almost no AVR-specific code has been merged, including clang
> support, which should come after the backend is functional.
> How is the llvm-avr backend integration going ? Will it be functional (
> experimental ) in the 3.8 release ?  Will Clang recognize options for avr ?
>
> thanks.
>    Allen
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160206/5b7996d0/attachment.html>