[llvm-dev] 3.9 regression with legacy static assert macros (bad type resolution)

[Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev]

It already shipped AFAIK: http://releases.llvm.org/download.html

— 
Mehdi

> On Dec 27, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Akira Hatanaka via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Can we still check patches into 3.9.1?
> 
>> On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 23, 2016, at 11:17, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 22, 2016, at 9:36 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.9.0 and current release_39 (r90413) have issues with older static assertion macros like this one from an older libunwind:
>>>> 
>>>> #define COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT( expr )    \
>>>>            extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( expr ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );
>>>> 
>>>> I notice that the issue is fixed on current trunk.  Does anyone know what revision introduced the fix?  Can we get it cherry-picked into release_39?  I know 3.9.1 final was just tagged, but having it on the branch will make it easier for distributions to find since this is a fairly common pattern, and of course it would be good to fix this regression in 3.9.2 if there is one
>>> 
>>> I think this was fixed in r280330 (in clang).
>> 
>> Thanks.  That indeed looks like it.  I'll pull that into our patchset, but could we get that cherry-picked onto release_39 to benefit others as well?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremy
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Fred
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --Jeremy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> 
>>>> ~ $ clang++-mp-3.9 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -c macho_relocatable_file.cpp 
>>>> In file included from src/ld/parsers/macho_relocatable_file.cpp:37:
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/DwarfInstructions.hpp:920:13: error: redeclaration of 'compile_time_assert_failed' with a different type: 'int [((int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)DW_X86_64_RET_ADDR) ? 1 : -1]' vs
>>>>  'int [1]'
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( (int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)DW_X86_64_RET_ADDR ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/Registers.hpp:548:13: note: previous declaration is here
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( sizeof(Registers_ppc) < sizeof(unw_context_t) ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> In file included from src/ld/parsers/macho_relocatable_file.cpp:37:
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/DwarfInstructions.hpp:1311:13: error: redeclaration of 'compile_time_assert_failed' with a different type: 'int [((int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)DW_X86_RET_ADDR) ? 1 : -1]' vs
>>>>  'int [1]'
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( (int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)DW_X86_RET_ADDR ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/Registers.hpp:548:13: note: previous declaration is here
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( sizeof(Registers_ppc) < sizeof(unw_context_t) ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> In file included from src/ld/parsers/macho_relocatable_file.cpp:37:
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/DwarfInstructions.hpp:1677:13: error: redeclaration of 'compile_time_assert_failed' with a different type: 'int [((int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)UNW_PPC_SPEFSCR) ? 1 : -1]' vs
>>>>  'int [1]'
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( (int)CFI_Parser<A>::kMaxRegisterNumber > (int)UNW_PPC_SPEFSCR ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> src/ld/parsers/libunwind/Registers.hpp:548:13: note: previous declaration is here
>>>> extern int compile_time_assert_failed[ ( sizeof(Registers_ppc) < sizeof(unw_context_t) ) ? 1 : -1 ] __attribute__( ( unused ) );;
>>>>        ^
>>>> 3 errors generated.
>>>> 
>>>> ~ $ clang++-mp-3.8 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -c macho_relocatable_file.cpp 
>>>> 
>>>> ~ $ clang++-mp-devel -Wno-invalid-offsetof -c macho_relocatable_file.cpp 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev