[llvm-dev] Call for testing/heads-up: NewGVN

[Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev]

Also: does clang bootstrap and pass the tests (and builds the test-suite correctly?).

— 
Mehdi

> On Dec 26, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I’m curious if the test-suite running cleanly with this flag?
> (That would be a first step before wider testing).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> — 
> Mehdi
> 
>> On Dec 26, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everybody.
>> NewGVN was recently committed and a few minute ago I added a flag to
>> enable the new experimental pass.
>> 
>> For the brave soul, passing `-mllvm -enable-newgvn` should do the
>> trick. We'll be happy to receive bug reports to analyze/fix, bonus
>> point if they contain a synthetic/reduced testcase.
>> Open a bug linked to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30995 would
>> be probably best so that all the people working on NewGVN will have
>> visibility, but I'm aware there are issues with bugzilla registration
>> disabled recently so if you have issues/don't have an account feel
>> free to shoot me a mail directly and I'll open a bug on your behalf.
>> 
>> Looking forward to hearing from you,
>> 
>> -- 
>> Davide
>> 
>> "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
>> or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev