[llvm-dev] [RFC] AAP Backend
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 26 09:55:24 PDT 2016
On 26 August 2016 at 17:45, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
> “Major corporation” does not mean size to me, I read it as “having a major involvement in the project”.
Still, you're rejecting new developers because they haven't
contributed much before.
But if their back-end is upstream, than they'll contribute code
upstream for their changes on their back-end.
However, if we don't allow their back-end to be upstream, they won't
contribute to the project.
Looks like a self-defeating argument, and one that still doesn't agree
with the open source philosophy.
Not to mention that it's an argument that is not required by the
policy in any way.
> “the question is about who will use/develop/maintain this backend upstream in LLVM?"
They have answered that question. Ed and Simon will be the active
maintainers. I imagine they have other developers around to help.
I don't see *any* concern here, nor any violation of the policy. Like
the Lanai back-end, the community is the maintainers. LGTM.
> "is there already an open-source community around this backend somewhere?"
This is not a requirement of the policy, nor was a requirement to any
other back-end, so not a valid argument.
If we were to reject changes for not having an open source community
elsewhere, we'd be chopping a very large parts of LLVM off.
More information about the llvm-dev